How to Write a Literature Review Medicine: 11 Simple Rules
Medical literature reviews are in great demand in most medical fields nowadays, especially the ones with the widest ranges. These are in great demand because every field is in need of something to prove and validate the findings of new people who are always creating new ideas and questions, proposing new ways of doing things and always in pro of advancement.
Thus, it is extremely important and comes with great advantages to using these kinds of works on recent literature in order to achieve more improvement to certain researchers and to give approval to others. However, writing a medical literature review demands more from the author, as these need to be professionally compiled and explain everything with no mistakes and validations.
Saying this, starting to write a literature medical review can demand a huge amount of work from the author as it needs to look as professional as it can. That is the reason for researchers to spend weeks, months and even years on one research, to make it look perfect. This means that there are lots of details of importance to take into account when writing an APA format literature review.
However, if you want to know how to write a literature review medicine, you’ll have to know its importance and what it is worth. This would help anyone to achieve the professionalism and the seriousness a work of this type demands.
Why Write a Literature Review Medical?
A literature review on medical subjects is a system used to study literature on a specific area in order to identify quality, potential, limitations and the importance of a certain subject. Also, a literature review gives the necessary background of a research paper, working as an introduction and as a plan for work of greater range.
When writing a review, the author should totally comprehend the subject he wants to write about, this would give more depth to the labor of writing and will help at differentiating between qualitative and quantitative data. This difference is the one that makes all the research have meaning, without it, the work is lost.
If the author doesn’t have a full comprehension of the subject, the review could lose its meaning and be negated as poor research. That is why it is important to have studied the subject before, in a meticulous way, in order to make every further step easier and with more knowledge, without losing meaning or purpose. When writing a literature review medical, there are some important steps to take in order to achieve better results. However, even when these steps are important, there are other recommendations and important things to take into account, things that have great importance when writing a research literature review.
To accomplish perfect medical review literature, the writer must achieve a completely professional profile and some skills of evaluation, research, and synthesis. As the author will work with great amounts of information, some skills like paraphrasing, evaluating, having the proper critical thinking, and lit review format APA sample will help a lot with this activity.
11 Simple Tips to Help Write a Medical Literature Review
However, the next tips on how to write a literature review medicine are as important as the previous ones that would get more insight and professionalism to the medical paper:
In order to write a proper literature review medical, the topic or subject must comply with some rules. However, the most important of them all is to make the topic work on a narrow subject and giving enough depth to make it look like it is wide. Also, it is very important to know that the activity of finding a perfect topic could take months and even years due to the importance of this factor as the whole purpose of the paper.
The topic must comply with:
- It must be interesting to the author and at a certain point, to the audience (always related to the work or study area of the author)
- Must depict an important aspect of the field in which it is being presented
- Must represent an important issue, defined and without mistakes in the creation, it must be totally directed to a certain issue.
When searching the literature to be reviewed on the topic of preference, the author must download and read all the relevant papers related to the field of study and the topic being presented.
To choose the best references and sources to add to the study, the author must:
- Keep a record of everything that’s being used on the paper
- Create criteria for papers that are not important on the field and give totally irrelevant information (these criteria can work as proof of the importance of the paper)
- Search for previous literature reviews on the same subject as this can come up very helpful
- It is important to note that carrying an original topic is a difficult action, as most topics are often already studied and sometimes perfectly developed and they cannot give more depth.
- If previous reviews are not perfectly developed, finding new angles or things that haven’t been covered before are always of great help
- To create new original material of importance and validity it’s always accepted
- The searches must comply with different approaches to the problem, its limitations, conclusions and other important factors of previous reviews
All the investigation and research must come with the correct and meticulous approval. All of the selection processes of the ideas that are worth to be written in the paper must comply with the criteria of the work, determined by a set of the question previously created in order to know which are the important details to take into account and which are not.
If the data found is not enough to prove the validity or give importance to the subject of the paper, the data could be meta-analyzed. This means that the author must compile all the relevant data as a primary study on the field, without losing any sense on the topic and still giving the backup it needs.
Taking notes of everything that has been written is always great at writing literature medical reviews, as these will help the author to avoid writing things twice and do not forget about authors, importance, background, and meaning of every concept and explanation being written.
— UCReD (@UniCanberra_ReD) January 12, 2017
Most types of review are often small and full ones. The small ones are always guided to develop a topic that doesn’t have a wide range of information, something that could be done in just a few pages while still giving enough information to make a point without losing sense or importance.
On the other hand, full reviews are more demanding, always needing of multiple hours of work and research, giving place to more complex and wide topics, creating more questions and portraying problems of more importance.
A literature review medical must always portray a problem or a question of importance on the field. Also, this problem should create new ideas and always be interesting to the subject being presented. This would help the author to get more recognition and the topic to be better researched. Without rambling on the content, the literature review must have a point, always concrete and with zero loose ends, while keeping it a point of interest for people.
The problem being depicted on the paper should always be of importance; however, previous studies and other papers related to the subject must be studied and given a critical review, without losing the consistency of the paper and without losing the point or the main objective of the paper question.
To do this, the author must:
- Research the major achievements in the field of study
- Have ideas that could be debated but not refuted
- The questions must have a point
A literature review is like any other kind of work on paper; it must have a total consistent style and comply with certain rules. Following certain formats of style and always having well-written content, focused on the topic, critical and without losing its sense; the structure of the paper will create the whole importance of the subject being depicted.
A great structure for literature reviews must consist of:
- An introduction
It is important to note that having the feedback from people with enough knowledge in the field of medicine, will always be one of the best ways to know if the work being written is capable of meeting the standards of work in the field. Other reviewers would also be able to find any inaccuracies, ambiguities or inconsistencies in the paper with more ease than the author, as they can work as a proof audience.
This point Is of most importance in the paper. All the ideas that will come from you are always the most important to portray. If the researcher has important, relevant, objective and interesting ideas on the field while doing it in a flawless manner with a perfect literature review, the author is most likely to get more recognition. However, all created ideas must be proved and backed up with other works and researchers, in order to not lose the objectivity and validity of the work.
Using new studies to back up all ideas coming from the author of the paper are always important in any field, however, if the author takes his time to also prove all his ideas with previous findings, especially the old ones, the work can have even more validity and importance of the field, by giving a more transcendental problem a solution.
Also, it is important to know that given the immense increase of literature reviews being published nowadays, most of them could be utterly wrong, so backing up all data with previous studies on the field will give a better idea of validity to the work being presented.
Even so, depending on the studies and ideas being used in the new research, all of them must totally be updated to their last form, as using outdated data from new or especially old studies gives less validity to the subject.
The more important the papers that are going to be used are, the best the research work is backed up, giving solidity to the data and losing insecurity on the work, creating a new idea that not only would need to import data but of all ideas that are not correct to include in the work.
How to Finish a Literature Review Medical Paper
The whole purpose of the paper should be portrayed in the conclusion, with a clear, brief and direct interpretation of what the paper is intended for, giving enough space for the audience to debate and further research to be done. The content of the whole should be rigorous, having quality information and data without losing any sense. If the whole paper doesn’t have a connection with the conclusion or vice-versa, the work would mislead the audience and thus the paper will lose its sense.
All questions must be answered, without leaving loose ends and with all researchers backing up the important depicted ideas of the work. The work should be criticized and its limitations must be indicated. The paper of its own must come totally independent of any other work, only using previous work to add validity and importance, that’s why it is important to always know how to write a literature review medicine, in order to portray a problem with the specification, giving honest ideas and solutions to problems.